Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Is King Kong Really a Flop?

Peter Jackson's remake of King Kong has grossed $66.2 million in its first five days in release. It had a disappointing Wednesday release, Monitor Duty has some thoughts on why, and a less than impressive Thursday, but still ended up as the fourth largest December release ever. So let's see...big opening, but not biggest ever, what's the story here? Ah, that's the real question isn't it? Turns out that ticket sales may end up down 6% for the film industry this year and a Kong flop seems the perfect way to end the year narratively. We all know how much the media love their narratives. Nevermind that Kong is three-hours long which cuts into it's number of showings. Nevermind that Narnia is in early release as well. Kong is a flop, just ask the LA Times and it is because there are no "stars" in it.

Just to remind people what a real flop looks like, I would like to make some comparisons:


Town and Country starring Warren Beatty (you know a big name) cost $105 million to make which is about half of Kong's budget. Though inflation adjusted it would be a little more than half. Town and Country had a $10 million worldwide gross. Total. Not opening weekend. Period. That's it.

Ishtar. While we are talking Warren Beatty, let's add Dustin Hoffman to to the mix. Cost $40 million...made $14 million and those are 1987 dollars folks.

Titanic, not a flop at all. Never topped $36 million on any given weekend. Cost $200 mil grossed $1.8 billion. Now I'm not saying Kong is Titanic, but that Titanic never had an "awesome" first weekend. Let's see if Kong has "legs" before we jump ship.

Heaven's Gate. Cost $44 million (1980 dollars), gross box office: $3.5 million.

The Four Feathers Cost: $35 million. Gross: $18.3 million.

Gone With the Wind, Wizard of Oz, Citizen Kane, were all flops when they came out.

Gigli. Cost: $54 million. US Gross: $6 million.

The Postman. Cost: $80 million. US Gross: $17 million.

Shanghai Surprise Budget: $17 million. US Gross: $2.32 million

The Adventures of Baron Munchausen. Budget: $46.6 million (1988 dollars) US Gross: $8.08 million.

Cutthroat Island. Cost: $92 million. US Gross: $10 million.

Hudson Hawk Cost: $65 million. US Gross: $17.2 million.

Battlefield Earth
Budget: $80 million. Worldwide Gross: $29.7 million.


Let's not presage the death of a film because it didn't make "as much as expected." Or the death of an industry that has survived the above flops.

Monday, December 19, 2005

Having Background Information is Useful...Being a Geek is Being a Geek

This past Saturday, I had the honor of hosting a town hall forum for some high school students who are interested in politics. In my job outside the village (that's a Prisoner reference), I promote youth civic engagement and this was a wonderful opportunity for some of the students I work with to listen to a diverse range of opinions about a politically salient topic. The topic of discussion, while it mattered to the students participating, is of little concern to the story I am about to share so let us leave it aside for the moment.

My panel was filled with excellent speakers from a broad range of professions, from academia to television writing/directing. I guess the one similarity the participants shared was that all of my speakers had been "published" in one format or another. As I mentioned above, one of the speakers was a television writer/director who has worked/created a number of shows I have enjoyed. As the diligent host, I -- who is already a geeky fan -- did additional background research so that I could have intelligent, but not "fan shocked," conversation. In other words, so that I could talk about what the writer/director is and will be doing rather than asking about minute obscuria from his shows. Who was this individual? Tim Minear, who has worked on no less than four of my favorite television shows of all time (Lois and Clark, Angel, Buffy, Firefly, to name the geekiest), and written/directed some of my favorite episodes. Needless to say, I think I came across as a fan, but not fanboy and was holding my own until the following occured...

TIM MINEAR

Comforatably enjoying his rubber chicken dinner.
[Telling a funny story about his time on Lois and Clark]

So Larry Niven wrote this short story called Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex that discusses how Superman would kill Lois if they ever tried to have children.

CHRISTIAN JOHNSON
Carefully attempting to stay cool...

That sounds like a lot of the conversations on comic book fan forums. Naturally, these discussions usually end with someone pointing out that only one person is "woman enough" for Superman...Wonder Woman



At this point everyone laughs and the joke is made. It is a veritable conversation coup. But then, alas, something I hadn't planned for occured. My deep geek knowledge, and excitement regarding the current Infinite Crisis, decided to surface. Sure the last comment was geeky, but it was a surface comment and funny. It was meant to be a joke after all, but the next comment was too geeky to be useful.

CHRISTIAN JOHNSON
Continuing obliviously

Naturally this leaves out the "pre-crisis" availability of Kara Starr aka Power Girl. Who was the Earth-2 equivalent of Supergirl, not to be confused with Supergirl who naturally died during the Crisis on Infinite Earths...


chirp chirp chirp


I am still reeling from the explosion of geekdom. I might as well have whipped out my copy of Who's Who in the DC Universe (every issue) and begun a detailed lecture on the multiple Earths and their relevance to the Superman mythos. Enough already...

Note to self, next time just leave it at the Wonder Woman joke.

At least I didn't talk about how disappointed I was that Helen Slater didn't get to talk to Patrick Dempsey when she was on Grey's Anatomy. I had hoped to see if there would be any references to Happy Together. How does this relate to the Lois and Clark/Superman story? Helen Slater played Supergirl, naturally.

Friday, December 16, 2005

Hello!

Yes, long time no postie. Haven't felt very pop culture-y. Anyway, we managed to con our Business Research Professor into endorsing our research into a female-friendly game store. I say 'conned' because everyone knows you can't have a female-friendly game store, right?

Well, it's my wife's idea, and she, being a female gamer, thinks the potential for thousands more is just limited by the loser guyishness of the whole thing. Is it true, or a utopian fantasy? Hell, I dunno. I guess you have the Frag Dolls, and a few similar things. And I've always noticed a reasonable amount of women at local cons,though not as much on the message boards, but I guess that's a second category. So, maybe it's true.

It seems to me that something like this is pretty online-focused. But then again, maybe not. We shall see, won't we?

So, anyway. The point of all of this is...

Wanna take our survey?

:)

Putting the Warcraft Back into the War Against Christmas

While Fox News is worrying about the "War Against Christmas," the ever embroiled citizens of the World of Warcraft are fighting to ensure a Happy Winter Veil.

Greatfather Winter has gifts in store for those who are willing to bring him Milk and Gingerbread cookies.

Higher level denizens can find and ride a Rudolph-like reindeer.

Have a conversation with a Snowman.

Collect snowballs to throw at your friends.


Buy Holiday gear from Goblins.

Many say that Winter Veil is becoming too commercial, and some speculate that the Goblin salesmen may be Horde infiltrators into Alliance territory. But one thing is certain. Winter Veil only lasts from December 15th through January 2nd and while it is going on, new players can join the World of Warcraft for only $19.99. I have to admit that I had my reservations about WoW, but once I started playing I dropped my other MMORPGs almost entirely. This is a fun game, and the seasonal event displays some of its glory.

So come join me, Faldir, over on the Malfurion server for some good times this Winter Veil season.

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Why I am a Catholic

Or...for those who thought the Monk in 1st Edition D&D didn't make any sense. This is for you.

Thanks to the Ziggurat of Doom for this one.

In Totally Bogus News, Cuba Won't Be Allowed To Particiate in the World Baseball Classic

Undermining the legitimacy of the inaugural World Baseball Classic, the United States Treasury Department denies Cuba permission to field a team. So much for a real "World Cup" style tournament for baseball.

Why Hackers Hate White Wolf: DRM, Success, and Misunderstood Ideas

Geeks of one type are often geeks of another kind as well. This is especially true of Role Playing Geeks, many of whom are knowledgable and skilled computer experts. Some rpg/computer geeks are the kind of people who have strong opinions against Intellectual Property protection, you know the kind of people who believe that "information wants to be free yo!" Music, books, tv show, if one know's how to use bit torrent or one of myriad other ways to download entertainment on to your computer, you can find what you want and not have to pay for it. Well, White Wolf games decided to attempt aggressive measures to protect their IP, and it appears that the less than scrupulous have decided to make them pay. You know the type, those who make Windows based viruses because Micro$oft is evil, and everyone should be using Linux anyway.

White Wolf has had some aggressive IP protection policies in its past, and I believe that is why they had to release the following press release:
Dear White Wolf Users,
Like many other well-known companies of the last few years, White Wolf was the target of an attack by international hackers this weekend. These hackers are now attempting to extort money from us with the threat of posting user data to the internet. We have

no intention of paying this money, and are in contact with the FBI in an attempt to bring these criminals to justice.

We are choosing to make this public so that our users and fans can take any precautions needed to protect themselves. We are recommending that if you have used your White Wolf user password as the password for any other services you use on the internet, that you change them immediately.

These hackers were able to exploit a flaw in our software and access user data, this data included usernames, email addresses and encrypted passwords. As far as we can ascertain, they were unable to access any credit card data (nor have they claimed they did). However, it is possible for the encrypted passwords they accessed to be decrypted given enough time.

In addition, the site will be down for the next few days while we evaluate some of the software we are using and take appropriate action to help prevent future attacks.

We appreciate your patience and concern while we work through the details of this process.

In addition to this posting we will be emailing our userbase with this information. For correspondence regarding this, please direct all queries to wwaccounts@white-wolf.com .


Why would hackers want to attack White Wolf? Is it really for the "user information" and possible fraud that can be gained from Credit Card information? Possibly, but I believe it is because of their aggressive IP policies. Someone wants to make White Wolf pay.

What are these aggressive policies?


When White Wolf began its online e-book service for roleplaying games (Drive Thru RPG.com the pdf files they offered where protected with DRM technology. DRM is a kind of digital registration program which prevents (or helps prevent) filesharing by tracking each individual file and requiring proper registration. There are some technical issues with DRM, as Adobe came out with new editions of Reader old DRM files sometimes couldn't be opened, Linux (information wants to be free yo!) users are adamantly in opposition to them, and there is a possibility that DRM files could leave security backdoors. A "carnival" presentation of many of the griefs against White Wolf and DRM can be found at Boing Boing. Needless to say, by instituting the very unpopular (among a very sophisticated crowd) technology White Wolf made a few enemies. White Wolf eventually removed the DRM protection and decided to go for a "watermark" protection which lists the purchaser of the product as a watermark. Thus is they suspect file sharing, they can find out who is the root sharer, but tracking/discovering theft is nigh impossible.

Then early this year, White Wolf attempted to protect their IP and ensure that those who charge others to play in events based on White Wolf products had to pay a royalty fee. This didn't mean that people playing the game for fun, in their homes, had to pay a royalty as the permission was in the purchase.

Rather White Wolf was looking at their products as a type of interactive theatre production and that others were charging people to participate in White Wolf based "live action" theatre events. White Wolf believed that those charging people to play in "live action" events should pay White Wolf a licensing fee. Their view was that it was the equivalent of the local theatre company having to pay rights on any play it charges an audience a fee. Some people might have a knee jerk reaction, and many did, to this and scream, "I shouldn't have to pay to play a game!" They are, naturally, correct. You shouldn't have to pay merely to play a game. But some people do charge to run Live Action Role Playing events. At it is wrong to think that when others are charging to play White Wolf's intellectual property that the people who are already charging players to play don't owe a royalty to White Wolf. It isn't hard to figure out folks. If you are making money off of some one else's IP, then you owe a portion of the proceeds to the creator(s). If I make a CD filled with me playing Johnny Cash songs, and I charge for the CD, I owe the Cash family some money. If I charge for a production of "The Producers" by Mel Brooks, I owe Mel some green. If I charge money for running an adventure in the "World of Darkness" using rules created by White Wolf, making money solely because it is White Wolf IP, then I owe White Wolf money. The only reason people who charge for their "storyteller" services are making money is because they are running a White Wolf game. But as you can see from discussions, many people don't care and were downright angry at the prospect and White Wolf had to reverse their policy.

Needless to say, you can see I am very much in favor of protecting IP, I don't hesitate to call filesharing theft. Maybe it is that my wife, and many I know, work in fields where IP is costing individuals I care about money. I can say adamantly that it is. It's funny how everyone wants to become a millionaire musician, writer, or artist, but that no one wants to pay for the products that others make. Filesharing and theft of IP seem to me to be childish, "I can take it for free so I will and they can't stop me!" behavior. The defenders of it make ridiculous arguments and mock the advertisements made to defend Intellectual Property. I can't tell you how many people are employed by the entertainment industry. I can't tell you how hard they all work. I can tell you that every time you download a file for free you are taking money from struggling songwriters, game designers, sound mixers, sound editors, journalists, etc. Instead of looking at what you are getting, think about what you would be losing if it were your product. Sure you might like millions of people to look at your creation, fame is desired by many. But fame doesn't pay the bills when you are older.